Food, Travel, Culture, Health, Military Service, News & Publishing, Non-fiction, Politics & Public Policy, TV, Radio, Audio

Where have you gone, Bill Maher?

Bill Maher likes to say he hasn’t changed — that it’s his audience who changed.

But he certainly did evolve, and I can pinpoint the precise year that evolution began: 2014.

That was the year students at the University of California, Berkeley, protested Maher’s December commencement keynote. Though he ended up delivering the address, the incident chafed and bruised Maher’s thin skin. You see, some of the students didn’t like Maher’s take on Islam; they felt his comments had crossed a line from fair criticism to overt racism. Maher argued that the tolerance they were demanding was entirely lacking from the religion they were championing.

I am not debating either point here. My point is that the experience changed him. It soured him to liberalism. He hasn’t been the same since.

On Friday night, he began his show with a taunting, “Yeah, I did it again, bitches. … Fuck you. I like these dinners,” referring to a dinner he attended with the President, Kid Rock and Stephen A. Smith this week.

Maher spends a lot of each “Real Time” episode mocking the Left — while turning a blind eye to his dinner companion as he literally sets the world ablaze.

The contrast between Maher of the aughts and Maher of the 2020s is glaring.

It’s hard to overstate how impactful Maher’s show was as President George W. Bush took the country to war in the aftermath of 9/11. It was a time when anyone who spoke out against the President or the Iraq War was labeled a terrorist sympathizer, a traitor. And Maher, to his credit, had people on his program like Michael Moore, who rightfully questioned the administration and the justification for war.

Maher asked the tough questions at a time when it was wildly unpopular to break free of the groupthink — a sort of stupor the nation had collectively fallen into. He threaded the needle between humor and earnest, probing curiosity — a comedian who could actually do journalism.

He could be self-deprecating. He could express empathy. He still had a sense of humility and could admit when he didn’t know something, or when he’d been wrong about a topic. He was genuinely funny. Even in the darkest times, he made us laugh, and it felt like a release, a long-awaited exhale when we did.

All of that is gone.

Once, an unapologetic atheist who highlighted atrocities made in the names of all religions, Maher now wholly sides with Israel in the Israel-Palestinian war, portraying the millennia-old conflict as black and white — the good guys versus the bad guys. It’s hard to square that with the Maher of 20 years ago, who could’ve objectively looked at the war to see atrocities on both sides. He could’ve held two truths in his mind: That Hamas is a terrorist organization and committed horrific acts on October 7, which must be punished, and that Israel’s response was relentless, indiscriminate and arguably criminal.

That Maher is gone, too. This Maher routinely dismisses pro-Palestinian protesters as anti-Semitic, immature and ignorant. He nitpicks the definition of genocide.

The past few years, Maher has dedicated a lot of his show to rants about a woke bogeyman, elevating the lore and amplifying the fear.

He frequently smack talks Democrats, insisting there’s a big contingent in the party that espouses anarchy and seeks to abolish the police. But there is not a single candidate running for election this year whose platform includes defunding the police. Granted, there are TWO candidates who came under fire for previously shitposting about cops.

Maher may forget that he was once a fierce critic of militarizing local police departments. Not a peep about that now.

There are 23 U.S. House and Senate candidates who won their primaries based on a platform that includes abolishing ICE. But ICE is a whole other animal, and of course, Maher knows that.

Politicians on the Right, many of whom can’t define the distinctions between the economic models of Capitalism, Communism and Socialism, have followed the President’s lead, choosing a blanket term: communists! And Maher’s fallen in lockstep with them.

Outlets like the Associated Press, PolitiFact and FactCheck.org have all done investigations into communist sympathies among this season’s candidates. The Associated Press even interviewed Joe Sims, the co-chair of the Communist Party USA, who said there are no — none, zero — candidates for either congressional chamber who are communists, nor anyone who subscribes to its Marxist ideologies.

On the matter of Socialism, across the entire country, there are 10 Democratic Socialists of America-endorsed congressional candidates this midterm cycle. They represent just 2.3% of the Democrat’s House candidates. It would be interesting to put Bernie Sanders (an Independent and avowed Democratic Socialist) in front of Maher again — a politician he used to respect if not revere — and see if he suddenly remembers what it means to be a Democratic Socialist, or if he’d conflate it with communism and call Sanders a communist to his face.

On this week’s show, Maher strangely pressed guest Gov. Andy Beshear (D-KY) to renounce communism, like some modern-day Joe McCarthy, but with a TV show and a stoner podcast.

Meanwhile, Maher and his writers largely ignore the hugely consequential democracy-destabilizing things like voter suppression, the politicization of the Justice Department, the destruction of allied relationships around the world, the Trump administration’s egregious attack on the free speech and the free press, growing Christian Nationalist influence over the federal government, and the unbridled, rampant corruption committed by the President, his family and his cronies.

There is so much he could sink his teeth into. But what we get, instead, is another bit about Sydney Sweeney’s breasts and Maher advocating for the President’s vanity ballroom.

You may have noticed that, like the current President, Maher is easily seduced by flattery, celebrity and awards. For as long as he’s been on TV, he’s been a shameless name-dropper. Count how many times he refers to guests on his show as friends. He wants you to know he has access to celebrities and people in power. I’d argue that’s what he likes most about Trump — that he has access to the President of the United States, and he doesn’t want to lose it.

So, every show feels like appeasement now — like he’s playing to an audience of one.

Or maybe the “Real Time” viewership only comes from producing MAGA clickbait now? Have all the liberals, progressives — and those scary communists and socialists — tuned out?

I mourn the Bill Maher of 20 years ago. Back then, I paid for an HBO subscription when I “didn’t have two nickels to rub together,” because I valued the conversations he moderated, the thoughtfulness of the guest bookings. The show felt serious, timely — in fact, urgent — and impactful. I was such a fan of the show that my family would tease me that I had to be home at 10 p.m. on Friday nights to watch my “boyfriend’s” show, a standing weekly date.

It’s probably too wishful to think “Real Time” will return to that format — accessible, conversational, earnest, LIVE journalism. It suited Maher as a host, and it was exponentially more constructive for the audience. He might also ponder a tip from this old reporter: Consider your sources. When you give a guest like Karoline Leavitt that coveted first chair and your one-on-one attention, it signals to the audience that honesty, integrity and truth are no longer of consequence to you.

Book Publishing, Food, Travel, Culture, Health, News & Publishing, Non-fiction, writing

Longtime New York Times Obituaries Editor William McDonald reflects on the intersection of history, biography, life and death

After 49 years in journalism, William McDonald’s recent retirement was well-earned. For the past 20 years, McDonald was The New York Times’ obituaries editor. In July, E&P spoke with him about his remarkable career; how the obituaries team operated; and his thoughts on life and death.

Read on at Editor & Publisher:

News & Publishing, TV, Radio, Audio

QUICK READ: Lenfest connects local newsrooms with the expertise they need to grow

Local newsrooms around the country continue to grapple with challenges related to audience, business models and revenue. Many lack the dedicated personnel and expertise to plan and manage new strategies. That’s the disconnect the Lenfest Expert Network (LEN) intends to bridge.

https://www.editorandpublisher.com/stories/lenfest-connects-local-newsrooms-with-the-expertise-they-need-to-grow,262082

Food, Travel, Culture, News & Publishing, Politics & Public Policy, TV, Radio, Audio, writing

World Press Freedom Day 2026

Today, we commemorate World Press Freedom Day. It comes at a troubling time for the international press — and for the public it serves. Particularly concerning for the United States, data shows that the U.S. is far from the beacon of this democratic principle it once was.

Before you read on at the link, think of where you’d expect the U.S. to fall in a press freedom ranking of 180 nations and territories. See how your number compares to the annual Reporters Without Borders’ RSF Press Freedom Index.

https://www.editorandpublisher.com/stories/world-press-freedom-day-2026-press-freedom-around-the-world-is-at-an-historic-low-including-a,261438

News & Publishing, TV, Radio, Audio

The News-Gazette launches local radio show to expand its journalism into audio

This year, the News-Gazette team — a staff of 16 full-timers — found a new way to develop its audience, serve the public, extend the reach of its journalism and innovate on a new platform. In January 2026, it launched News-Gazette Radio.

News & Publishing, Politics & Public Policy, TV, Radio, Audio

Nerd Prom’s worrisome guest list

I’ve long been ambivalent about the annual White House Correspondents Dinner — otherwise known as “nerd prom.”

This year’s red-carpeted gala will be held on Saturday, April 25 and televised on C-SPAN. President Donald J. Trump, the First Lady, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth will all be in attendance. 

Even among the press itself, there are two sides to this debate:

It was a terrible idea since its inception. The press shouldn’t be rubbing elbows with the people in power on whom they report. It’s a valid argument, though anyone who knows Washington, D.C. knows this type of social-circle intermingling happens all the time.

vs.

It raises money for scholarships! It’s a feel-good event, not to be taken too seriously — one night of the year when we can set aside our roles as “the power” and “the people tasked with holding power to account,” and celebrate the spirit of the nation and the brilliance of the First Amendment. 

And, in the past, it has been an occasion where the press, politicians, cabinet members, press secretaries and Hollywood celebrities found common ground through comedy and self-deprecation.

The President last attended the gala as a guest in 2011, but sat them out during his first administration. This year, he’s back, having accepted the WHCA’s standing invitation to the President of the United States, and questions swirl about what Trump will say about the press in the room — and what they’ll have the courage to say about him. 

No President nor politician ever adored the press, but President Trump comes close. His rhetoric would lead one to believe that he detests the media, but I think the opposite may be true. 

It’s like the boy in 5th grade who has a crush on the girl sitting next to him in class, but he doesn’t know how to get and keep her attention. So, he acts silly, says mean things to her and relentlessly kicks the leg of chair while his friends laugh. 

Prior to politics, Trump flirted with and manipulated the press to his gain — as a businessman, man about town and reality-TV star. As Commander in Chief, he is drawn to microphones, cameras, a pool of reporters, a press pen at one of his stadium rallies. And they’ve given him what he craves and needs to sustain his brand. 

Yet the harm he’s inflicted on the press, in return, has been ruthless and harsh. He seizes every opportunity to lambast, to personally insult reporters, and to portray the news media as “enemies of the people.” He’s sued the press, negotiating millions in settlements — monies allocated to his future Presidential Library, now allegedly unaccounted for. 

Trump famously shrugged off the murder of The Washington Post’s Jamal Khashoggi, saying “things happen.” More recently, when asked about Khashoggi’s murder, the President said, “A lot of people didn’t like that gentleman,” as if it were justification.

Under the leadership of his appointments at the Department of Justice and FBI, Washington Post’s Hannah Natanson’s home was raided, her digital devices confiscated, igniting a costly court battle and sending a purposeful chill through newsrooms, government sources and would-be whistleblowers. 

CBS News made the odd choice to invite Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth as its guest to the dinner. 

You’ll recall, Hegseth was picked to lead the most sophisticated, well-financed military ever known from his former role stirring up controversy at Fox News. Despite media being the reason for his brand and livelihood, the Secretary takes predictable, daily, ad hominem shots at the press. He booted Pentagon reporters from their convenient closet-sized workspaces. He required them to sign pledges that narrowed the scope and tone of their work. Earnest, ethical journalists refused.

In fact, it’s difficult to imagine a guest list more hostile to the press — and corrosive to the First Amendment— than Saturday night’s. 

Absent from this year’s gala is a keynote comedian, so there goes the fun, self-deprecating part of the tradition. Instead, a “mentalist” will perform. Make of that what you will. 

And the President will speak. 

I’m not making any predictions about how the evening will unfold, but on paper, it reads cringy and toxic. Perhaps it is past time for the WHCA to consider a fresh fundraising event, the start of a new tradition.

News & Publishing, Politics & Public Policy, TV, Radio, Audio

QUICK READ: White House plays politics with press accountability.

Presidents critical of the press aren’t new, but Trump’s tactics represent a significant escalation. At the link, read my conversation about the White House’s online “burn book,” with Christoph Mergerson, Ph.D., assistant professor at the University of Maryland’s Philip Merrill College of Journalism.

https://www.editorandpublisher.com/stories/white-house-plays-politics-with-press-accountability,260650

#Trump #FirstAmendment #newsmedia #journalism

News & Publishing

Tapping into the power of data

Data is transforming investigative journalism — from satellite imagery to foster care records — helping reporters uncover stories hidden in plain sight.

#DataJournalism #DigitalForensics #NewYorkTimes #Bellingcat #MountainStateSpotlight

Climate & the Environment, Health, News & Publishing, Politics & Public Policy

Small solutions add up

50 States, 50 Fixes: How local climate solutions are resonating across America — my conversation with The New York Times’ Climate Editor Lyndsey Layton.

#NYTimes #climate #localnews

https://www.editorandpublisher.com/stories/50-states-50-fixes-how-local-climate-solutions-are-resonating-across-america,259044

News & Publishing, Politics & Public Policy, TV, Radio, Audio

When a whistleblower calls

QUICK READ: How top journalists protect sources and turn secrets into stories

Read at the link or in the September 2025 Editor & Publisher print edition:

https://www.editorandpublisher.com/stories/when-a-whistleblower-calls-how-top-journalists-protect-sources-and-turn-secrets-into-stories,257795